The Mind That Sees Without Knowing
Blindsight, Hidden Cognition, and the Coaching Implications of What You Don't Know You Know'
By Dancing Dragons Media
•
Loading...
Preparing something amazing for you!
Preparing something amazing for you!
Blindsight, Hidden Cognition, and the Coaching Implications of What You Don't Know You Know'
In the 1970s, a man known in scientific literature as Patient S.B. suffered a stroke that damaged his primary visual cortex in one hemisphere.
His eyes were healthy. His optic nerves were intact. But something was missing.
Patient S.B. had lost vision in one half of his visual field. If an object appeared on his right side, he could see it clearly. If it appeared on his left side, it did not exist. Not blurred. Not distorted. Gone.
Doctors tested him repeatedly. When asked to describe what he saw in the blind field, he reported nothing. Darkness. Absence. He was completely sincere.
But then something unexpected happened.
When researchers asked him to guess—just point to where a light might be, even though he claimed he couldn't see it—Patient S.B. pointed accurately. He could locate lights. He could detect movement. He could distinguish between shapes. He could navigate around obstacles placed in his blind field.
All while insisting he was guessing.
He was not aware of seeing anything. And yet, his brain was processing visual information with remarkable precision.
Neurologist Lawrence Weiskrantz gave this phenomenon a name: blindsight.
And it changed how we understand consciousness itself.
Before blindsight, the default assumption in both psychology and philosophy was roughly this: perception and awareness are the same thing. You see something, and you know you see it. You hear something, and you know you hear it. Consciousness and cognition were treated as inseparable—one unified stream.
Patient S.B. shattered that assumption.
His case demonstrated three things that remain foundational in cognitive science:
1. Perception can occur without awareness. His brain was receiving, processing, and acting on visual data. But none of that information reached his conscious experience. The processing was real. The experience was absent.
2. Consciousness is not required for complex processing. This wasn't a simple reflex. Patient S.B. was making spatial judgments, detecting motion direction, and discriminating between shapes—all sophisticated cognitive operations—without any conscious involvement.
3. The brain knows more than the mind experiences. There is a vast difference between what your neural systems are computing and what "you"—the conscious, narrating self—actually receive as reportable experience.
That gap—between what the brain computes and what the mind experiences—turns out to be enormous. And it has implications far beyond neurology.
Blindsight is dramatic because the dissociation is total: a person sees without any awareness at all. But the principle it reveals operates on a spectrum that affects all of us, every day.
Cognitive scientists estimate that the human brain processes roughly 11 million bits of sensory information per second. Of that, conscious awareness handles about 50 bits per second. The ratio is staggering. Your conscious mind is experiencing less than 0.0005% of the information your brain is actually processing.
This is not a deficiency. It's a design feature.
Consciousness is expensive. It's slow. It's serial—it can only handle one deliberate thing at a time. Evolution didn't build it to handle everything. It built it to handle the novel, the threatening, and the uncertain. Everything else gets delegated downstairs.
And "downstairs" is where most of your life actually happens.
You drive a car without thinking about steering. You type without thinking about which finger hits which key. You read facial expressions in milliseconds, long before you could articulate what you noticed. You walk into a room and feel "something is off" before any conscious analysis has begun.
These are not minor background processes. They are the dominant mode of your cognition.
Consciousness is the press secretary. The unconscious processing systems are the entire government.
This brings us to habit formation—and to the part that coaches encounter every day.
A habit, neurologically speaking, is a behavior that has been transferred from conscious, effortful processing to automatic, unconscious processing. It's a piece of cognition that has graduated from the slow, deliberate system (what Daniel Kahneman calls "System 2") to the fast, automatic system ("System 1").
The basal ganglia—a cluster of structures deep in the brain—play a central role in this transfer. When you first learn to drive, every action requires focused attention: check mirrors, press clutch, shift gear, signal, check blind spot. It's exhausting. It saturates your conscious bandwidth.
After months of practice, those sequences chunk together and sink below the surface. The basal ganglia take over. The behavior becomes automatic. You can now drive while holding a conversation, listening to a podcast, or mentally rehearsing a presentation.
This is a triumph of neural efficiency. But it comes with a catch.
Once a behavior becomes automatic, you lose conscious access to it.
You can't easily introspect on how you drive, because the knowledge isn't in a form that consciousness can read. It's encoded in procedural memory—motor patterns, stimulus-response chains, timing sequences—none of which translate neatly into words.
And this is precisely what makes bad habits so difficult to change.
A person who habitually interrupts others in meetings doesn't experience themselves as "choosing to interrupt." The interruption happens before conscious deliberation gets involved. It's a pattern that fires automatically in response to certain social cues—excitement, disagreement, anxiety about being unheard.
Telling that person to "just stop interrupting" is like telling Patient S.B. to "just see" with his blind field. The instruction targets the wrong level of the system.
Here is the core problem that blindsight illuminates for anyone trying to change their behavior:
Most of what drives you is invisible to you.
Your emotional reactions. Your default interpretations of other people's behavior. Your assumptions about what you deserve. Your communication patterns under stress. Your relationship with authority. Your response to failure.
These are all running on systems that operate below the threshold of awareness—not because they're trivial, but because they've been running so long they've been delegated to automatic processing.
You are, in a meaningful sense, blind to them. You are Patient S.B., navigating a world you can't consciously see.
And like Patient S.B., you're accurate enough most of the time. Your automatic systems are competent. They get you through the day. They manage relationships, avoid threats, and conserve energy.
But competent is not the same as optimal. And automatic is not the same as aligned—aligned with who you want to be, how you want to lead, or how you want to show up in your relationships.
This is the gap. The gap between automatic competence and intentional excellence.
And this is exactly where coaching lives.
Self-help books operate almost entirely at the level of consciousness. They give you concepts, frameworks, mental models, and instructions. They assume that if you understand the right thing, you'll do the right thing.
But blindsight tells us that understanding and doing are different systems.
You can read ten books on emotional intelligence and still react defensively in a difficult conversation. You can memorize every principle of active listening and still fail to hear what your partner is actually saying. Knowledge, by itself, doesn't rewire automatic processing.
Coaching works differently. Here's why.
Just as Patient S.B. needed researchers to demonstrate that he was responding to stimuli he couldn't consciously perceive, a client often needs a coach to surface patterns they can't self-detect.
"Did you notice that every time we talk about your manager, your tone changes?"
"I've observed that you describe yourself as 'not a leader,' but in the last three examples you gave, you were the one everyone turned to."
"You say you're fine with the decision, but you just crossed your arms and looked away."
A coach functions as a second visual cortex—one that can see the client's blind field.
This is not psychoanalysis. It's structured observation. It's a trained professional reflecting back patterns that the client's own consciousness cannot access because those patterns are running on the automatic operating system.
Changing a habit requires pulling an automatic behavior back into conscious processing—making the invisible visible—and then deliberately practicing a new pattern until that becomes automatic.
This is exactly the loop that coaching facilitates:
This is not a metaphor. This is the actual neuroscience of behavior change. The basal ganglia update their stored sequences. The prefrontal cortex releases control. The behavior becomes fluent.
A coach doesn't just tell you what to change. A coach holds the structured space in which the re-encoding process can actually happen over time.
There's a concept in cognitive science called "implicit learning"—the acquisition of knowledge and skills without conscious awareness. You've been doing it your whole life. You learned the grammatical rules of your native language without anyone teaching you what a subordinate clause was. You learned the social rules of your family without anyone giving you a manual.
But implicit learning cuts both ways.
You also learned things you didn't choose to learn: that vulnerability is dangerous, that asking for help means weakness, that conflict must be avoided, that your worth is conditional on performance.
These are not beliefs you chose. They are beliefs your nervous system absorbed from the environment—and they became automatic. They are now part of your unconscious operating system, guiding your behavior without your awareness or consent.
Coaching is one of the few processes that systematically makes these implicit beliefs explicit. It drags them from the automatic system into the conscious system, where they can be examined, questioned, and—if necessary—replaced.
This is why coaching conversations often feel like something is being "uncovered" rather than "taught." The knowledge was already there. It was just running in the dark, like Patient S.B.'s visual processing—real, influential, and completely invisible to the conscious mind.
There's one more dimension of blindsight that maps directly onto coaching.
When Patient S.B. was asked to explain how he could point to lights he claimed not to see, he had no answer. His conscious mind—the narrating self—had no access to the process that was generating his accurate responses.
He was doing something he couldn't explain. And he was right about what he was doing, and wrong about what he knew.
Clients in coaching do this constantly.
They describe themselves as "not strategic thinkers" while demonstrating sophisticated strategic reasoning. They say they're "bad at relationships" while maintaining deep, loyal friendships. They insist they "don't know what they want" while making choices that point clearly in a consistent direction.
The narrating self is often the least reliable source of information about the person. It's working with a tiny fraction of the available data. It confabulates. It recycles old stories. It mistakes inherited beliefs for current truths.
A good coach learns to listen to the narrator—and then look at the behavior. When the two diverge, the behavior is almost always more honest.
"You keep saying you're not a leader. But let's look at what you actually did last quarter."
That's the coaching move. You use the evidence the client's own unconscious systems are generating to challenge the story their conscious mind is telling.
You help them see what they're already doing—but don't know they're doing.
You treat them like Patient S.B.: respect the blindness, but trust the sight.
Patient S.B.'s condition was permanent. The damage to his visual cortex couldn't be reversed.
But the metaphorical blindsight that runs most of human behavior is not permanent. It can be made visible. It can be brought into awareness. It can be worked with, updated, and transformed.
That's the work of coaching.
Not giving advice. Not imposing frameworks. Not lecturing about best practices.
Helping someone see what their mind already knows but their consciousness hasn't caught up with yet.
The brain is always processing more than you realize. It's always computing more than you can report. It's always generating responses that your narrating self can't fully explain.
A coach doesn't add new information to that system. A coach helps the system become visible to itself.
And when that happens—when the unconscious pattern becomes conscious, when the automatic becomes deliberate, when the habit that ran in the dark finally steps into the light—that's not just insight.
That's transformation.
Patient S.B.'s case was documented by Lawrence Weiskrantz in Blindsight: A Case Study (Oxford University Press, 1986). It remains one of the most important demonstrations that awareness and perception are separate systems—and that the brain computes far more than the mind experiences. For coaches, the implication is clear: the person sitting across from you knows more than they think they know. Your job is to help them find it.
Please log in or sign up to leave a comment.
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Reading time: 7 minutes
Discover how top executives build sustainable careers by intentionally designing work-life integration that maintains high performance without sacrificing health.
A comprehensive guide to measuring executive coaching ROI, including proven frameworks, metrics, and templates to quantify outcomes and justify coaching investments to stakeholders.