Navigating Privacy Standards in Coaching and Healthcare

Why 5:1 (Clients:Coaches) is the “Golden Ratio”

At dancingdragons.cc, the 5:1 ratio is a practical design target for marketplace health: enough clients per coach to keep coaches engaged, and enough coaches per client to keep client choice and scheduling smooth.

It’s a “golden ratio” because it balances three competing constraints:

• Client experience: clients need enough available coaches (choice, specialty fit, time slots).
• Coach experience: coaches need enough active demand to earn consistently and stay on-platform.
• Platform economics: the platform needs enough recurring volume to cover fixed costs while staying competitive on take-rate.

The Inputs (Reasonable Estimates, Based on Your Reality)

You provided the two inputs that matter most:

• Retention: 5 sessions per client on average
• Cadence: 1 session every 10 days on average

You also provided platform revenue per session:

• Platform revenue per session (min / avg / max): $20 /$30 / $200

Because the platform takes 15% of GMV, this implies an average GMV per session of about:

• GMV per session (avg): ( $30 / 0.15 =$200 )

ARPC and LTV (Derived from Cadence + Take Rate)

Let:

• Sessions per month per active client ≈ ( 30.4 / 10 = 3.04 )
• Platform revenue per month per active client (average) ≈ ( 3.04 \times $30 =$91.20 )

So the implied ARPC ranges are:

• Low ARPC (platform): ( 3.04 \times $20 \approx$60.80 ) per client per month
• Base ARPC (platform): ( 3.04 \times $30 \approx$91.20 ) per client per month
• High ARPC (platform): ( 3.04 \times $200 \approx$608.00 ) per client per month

And the implied GMV ARPC ranges are:

• Low ARPC (GMV): ( $60.80 / 0.15 \approx$405 ) per client per month
• Base ARPC (GMV): ( $91.20 / 0.15 \approx$608 ) per client per month
• High ARPC (GMV): ( $608 / 0.15 \approx$4,053 ) per client per month

Client LTV (platform), using 5 sessions:

• Low LTV: ( 5 \times $20 =$100 )
• Base LTV: ( 5 \times $30 =$150 )
• High LTV: ( 5 \times $200 =$1,000 )

The Hidden Implication: Short Retention Creates a Huge Acquisition Burden

If a client averages 5 sessions spaced 10 days apart, the average relationship lasts about:

• 5 sessions × 10 days ≈ 50 days ≈ 1.64 months

That means the platform must replace a large fraction of active clients every month to hold the 5:1 ratio steady.

This one number (0.61) is why CAC matters so much in a short-retention marketplace.

CAC and Intake Cost Assumptions (Low / Base / High)

Intake specialist conversion cost (your model):

• $20/hr +$30 commission
• Assumed 1.25 hours per conversion average
• Intake cost per converted client ≈ ( 1.25 \times $20 +$30 = $55 )

Client CAC (paid/blended) is the biggest swing factor.

Here are “reasonable” planning values consistent with the above LTV:

• Low CAC: $35 per converted client
• Base CAC: $60 per converted client
• High CAC: $95 per converted client

Variable acquisition cost per new client (CAC + intake):

• Low: ( $35 +$55 = $90 )
• Base: ( $60 +$55 = $115 )
• High: ( $95 +$55 = $150 )

The 10-Year Growth Target (June 2025 → June 2035)

The long-term plan:

• Milestone 1: 1,000 coaches / 5,000 active clients
• Milestone 2: 5,000 coaches / 25,000 active clients

This forecast uses a smooth growth path that hits:

• June 2025: 50 coaches / 250 clients
• June 2029: 1,000 coaches / 5,000 clients
• June 2035: 5,000 coaches / 25,000 clients

Revenue Model (Monthly)

Monthly sessions at a given active client count:

• Sessions per month ≈ ActiveClients × 3.04

Monthly platform revenue at the average $30/session:

• Platform revenue per month ≈ SessionsPerMonth × $30

Variable Acquisition Load (Monthly)

With a ~1.64 month average lifetime, the steady-state replacement need is roughly 0.61× active clients per month.

Fixed and Semi-Fixed Costs (Reasonable Estimates)

To keep the model grounded but simple, we use:

• IT fixed cost: grows with complexity and staff
  • Jun 2025: $20k/mo
  • Jun 2029: $60k/mo
  • Jun 2035: $150k/mo
• Infra variable cost: $2 per active client per month (hosting, video, storage, observability, tooling)
• Brand/marketing overhead (not CAC): content, creative, partnerships, tools
  • Jun 2025: $10k/mo
  • Jun 2029: $25k/mo
  • Jun 2035: $60k/mo

These are placeholders you can tune as you learn real spend.

Profit Model (Low / Base / High CAC)

We compute monthly “contribution profit” as:

• Contribution profit = Revenue − Variable acquisition cost − IT (fixed + variable) − Brand overhead

Where:

• Variable acquisition cost ≈ GrossNewClients × (CAC + Intake)
• Intake ≈ $55 per converted client

June Snapshot Table (Monthly Economics at Each June)

This is a “per month” table where each row is the June month for that year.

Assumptions used in this table:

• Platform $/session:$30 (avg case)
• Sessions per active client per month: 3.04
• Gross new clients per month (replacement): ActiveClients × 0.61
• CAC scenarios: $35 /$60 / $95
• Intake per conversion: $55
• Variable acquisition per new client: $90 /$115 / $150

What the Table Is Telling You (In Plain English)

At 25,000 active clients, you’re running about 76,000 sessions per month.

If the platform earns $30 per session**, that’s about **$2.28M/month in platform revenue.

But with only 5 sessions average retention, you’re also replacing on the order of 15k new clients per month just to stay at that size.

That makes CAC a first-class product metric, not “just marketing.”

A Simple “Break-Even” Heuristic

If you want to be robust, a useful rule is:

• ( \text{CAC} + \text{Intake} \le 60% \times \text{LTV} )

Because you still need to fund IT, support, refunds/disputes, and growth experimentation.

With base LTV ≈ $150:

• 60% of LTV ≈ $90

Which means:

• CAC + intake should aim for around $90 (or lower) for strong profitability at this retention level.

The 2025–2035 “Growth Story” in One Sentence

If you can keep the marketplace close to 5 active clients per coach while maintaining $30 platform revenue per session, then:

• The business can scale to millions per month in revenue.
• Profitability will be dominated by CAC and retention because replacement volume is large at 5 sessions average.

If you want, the next post can extend this model to:

• A retention ladder (5 sessions, 8 sessions, 12 sessions) and how it changes replacement demand.
• A mixed revenue model (1:1 + group sessions + corporate) and how it changes ARPC distribution.
• A dedicated intake capacity model (how many intake specialists you need at each scale).

Book a Discovery Call